Can you send me literature reference that you are pointing to?
Also please go to "Collaborate" tab and sahre your model with email@example.com and make support an admin user.
I will take a look. Thanks.
I read it some years ago and my lecture also said that we can use ibrav 0 for silicon band structure and still getting the same structure with that of ibav 2. I just did it but I got different band structures, however I did not know where the error emanated from that is why I posted it here for you to help
@Falaye75, OK. Please create 2 different models on kogence for 2 cases. Run them o kogence. Make sure they are showing different results. Then share both those models using "Collaborate" tab with firstname.lastname@example.org and make support an admin user.
I will take a look. thanks.
I do not know how to do that
I watched the video and some other things yet I could not get what I needed. Please
what is wrong with my input files for ibrav 0 both scf and band?
What makes ibrav 0 structure differ from ibrav 2 structure?
Ibrav 0 gives direct band gap while ibrav 2 gives indirect band gap. It is kwon that silicon has indirect band gap. What is responsible for this disparity?
You can try and run the program to know what I am talking about.